Love Love Love <3 ~BK
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Bob Wright's $3,500,000 DOV Documents - Approval from Bank Pending
Bob Wright's $3,500,000 DOV Documents - Approval from Bank Pending
July 31, 2013Thanks to BZ and I-UV for getting this post together and Justin for expanding on it. As he said, "approval from the bank is pending." They very well may not approve this transaction. Soon this process will become bulletproof, allowing EVERYONE on the planet to access the value that is and has always been rightfully theirs. This post is a great educational tool, so those who are still lost by this process can better understand the fundamentals behind it. ~BK
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/bob-wrights-3500000-dov-documents.html
Here are the Documents Bob Wright used to 'Deposit' his DOV. This DOV is still being reviewed by the Bank (not known which bank at this time) and the funds are NOT as of yet available to Bob - Updates pending.
We can use these to gain an understanding of his process. This is the INNER work we can do. When the Documents are ready, you will be ready to partner up with your local bank, getting a head start will probably help the process.
Bob used the method of "getting the banker on his side." The banker revealed during the conversation last Thursday that she "hopes it goes threw because if it does, she will be the next in line." This is coming from the VP of the head quarters not a branch manager. The VP also revealed that "September 1st is coming faster then we know it" hinting at something possibly changing in a major way.
There is a powerful potential building in the consciousness of earth right now and as we each express our inner truths to others, we help prepare the rest of humanity for what is coming... US!
To be absolutely clear, Bob has Deposited his value, this does not mean he walked out of the bank with $3,500,000.00. A deposit must be cleared just like a check, and to be sure a deposit of this size will take time. This may not always be the case, when the DOV for all is available, I am sure there will be some kind of waiting period.
If you are new to Bob's DOV read the previous update here:
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/bob-wright-deposits-dov-transcript-of.html
Bob Wright : The docs Bob Created to Access a Small Portion of His Value
These are the documents that Bob created and brought into his bank to access a small portion of his value. The documents can be viewed and downloaded in the Scribd window, downloaded directly as a word doc or pdf…
At the end of the post you can see the transcript of Bob discussing his experience with his bank using these documents.
Direct download versions of the documents that Bob Wright created:
Bob Wright’s Certificate of Value Word version Click here
Bob Wright’s Certificate of Value pdf version Click here
Bob Wright’s Declaration of Being Word version Click here
Bob Wright’s Declaration of Being pdf version Click here
Bob Wright’s Intent to Deposit Word version Click here
Bob Wright’s Intent to Deposit pdf version Click here
Bob Wright’s Request for Documentation of Funding Word version Click here
Bob Wright’s Request for Documentation of Funding pdf version Click here
Secured Order of Reconciliation pdf version Click here
Note: Bob’s recent bank visit information was fully transcribed below:
Bob: It’s not even us versus them! And later on I’m going to tell you about my story/experience with my bank, but the people in the bank that are working ALSO are feeling the repression.
Lisa: Well, let’s actually address that… because there does seem to be some people who think that Kiri is the ONLY one that’s done this. Kiri’s just done this in the most public way and has had our complete support, but she’s not the ONLY one. Not everyone is waiting for Heather. Not everybody even knows about The One People’s Public Trust or the I UV system; they’re DO’ing their own process; which is pretty much what Kiri did anyway. But we do have one of our own… Bob has come up with his own declaration and did go and visit his bank, so let’s go to it Bob… tell your story.
Bob: Well first off, I’m NOT one to wait!
Lisa: No (agreeing), you’re not.
Bob: I’m just not a waiter and our DO’ing does NOT depend on any other’s DO’ing! Just so I get that straight and clear. My DO’ing I’m responsible for and I’m not depending on anyone else’s DO’ing for my DO’ing. So I did.
I created what I called a ‘Certificate of Value’ to certify my value being secured in three and a half million units. I also gave a letter of intent and a foreclosure notice along with the UCC Financing Statement securing all of our value. That document is I think 20004135 or something like that. And I presented that to the bank.
Now when I first went into the bank I spoke with the Assistant Vice President and she was very helpful, very nice and she asked me “What can I do for you?” I explained “We are representatives of the new financial system that is forthcoming. In the position that you’re in I’m sure that you are very well aware that there’s some major changes happening in the financial industry.”
She just laughed. She is like “You don’t have to tell me!”. She did let slip that September 1st will be here before we know it. We can talk about that later.
So I says “Are you aware of the foreclosure of the Bank of International Settlements and all of its charters?”
And she says “No!”
So I gave her a copy of the Foreclosure (Freedom) Flyer and she immediately started to get hesitant. I assured her, I said “Look! I’m not here to shut down the bank. I’ve been a member of this bank since 2009, I would like to continue my relationship with the bank, but I want to do so transparently and under my terms and conditions.”
She then goes “Fine, well what can we do for you?”
I explained to her about the whole process that led to the foreclosure. And along the way, I’m not going to go through everything in detail, but I explained from the Paradigm Report and what was found; that all loans were fraudulent because they were basically created out of nothing and led back to The People who were always the creditors.
She did confirm that money was created on the spot on the screen. She confirmed that they don’t have to lend out their deposits; that they lend it based on the exchange of the promissory note. She also confirmed that all money was based and backed by the energy and value of The People.
So she looked at my Certificate of Value and she read the front of it, which basically says that “This is my value, my body, my soul which has been secured under UCC filings blah, blah, blah. Duly verified so and so forth… all Heather-speak 5 billion units”. She looked at it and she read it and she says “For every man, woman and child?” And she goes “Is that for me too?”.
I said “Yes, it’s for you too! Just because you’re working for a bank does NOT mean that you’re NOT one of The People.”
She understood everything I had been saying up until that point and she said “Well, I really don’t understand how I could have all of this money having not earned it!”
I said, “Well, really, how valuable do you think you are?” I asked her how much she would sell her soul for. She wouldn’t. I even offered her one hundred billion for it. She refused.
I said “Well you’re pretty valuable then, aren’t you? Don’t you think you should be able to ‘spend’ some of that value?” She seemed to get it and she was like “Well, I don’t know what to do with this certificate. I don’t know how to process it. This is all new. I’ve never…”
I said “That’s why it’s called the new financial system!” I said “Why don’t you take these documents, take it down to your underwriting department. They can verify the security, the Financing Statement and the numbers that are provided on the document. They can assign the document a CUSIP number and you can deposit as a security.”
She says “Well, you know an awful lot about the banking industry.”
I said “Well, don’t you think people should know? This is the whole point about operating transparently.”
She goes “Well, okay, well, I’m going to send it down.” And she whispers in my ear “I really, really hope that this goes through for you, because if it does I’m next in line!”
This is the Assistant Vice President of the bank.
Brian: This is not the branch either; it’s like the Assistant Vice President of the main office.
Bob: … the main office… right! And so she said “We should know within 72 hours.”
So that was last Thursday and I did call the bank this morning. They transferred me to the Vice President… I’m moving up… and she was in a different office and I spoke with her. She says “Well, I spoke with my assistant and I heard everything that she had to say. I haven’t seen the documents that you presented yet, but I’m going to tell you that I really don’t think that we can do what you’re asking.”
And I says “Oh really, why?”
And she says “Well, you want us to deposit three and a half million dollars in your account.”
I said “Yes basically!”
And she goes “Well, I didn’t see your certificate or I don’t know the validity of this foreclosure. I haven’t looked at the documents.”
I said “I understand that.”
She says “From what I understand, there’s no origin of the money? Where’s the money coming from? Where’s the money originating?”
And I said “I might ask that same question of you for every loan that you’ve purportedly given to anyone. Where did the origin of those funds come from? Can you give me the right title and ownership three generations for any loan, any one that you’ve ever given to any person at any time?”
And her response was and I quote “Well, ah, oh!”
(Everyone laughs)
And I says “The reason why you can’t is because we are always the creditors. We are the creditors of every lending transaction ever made and have always been so and remain so. As the creditor and the creator of every representation of value also known as money, right, I wish to deposit that value in your bank. And unless you have a superior court judge giving a lawful reason why these UCC filings are not valid or you have rebutted those filings with specificity and particularity they stand as international law in court.”
And I sent her a letter and I says “You know, the letter basically said that due to the nature of the documents that I gave you in the foreclosure of the banking system for cause of operating private money systems profiteering and benefiting from the operation of a debt slavery system and committing treason against the One People, I would like to verify that you by your actions are not upholding a debt slavery system. Please provide the following. And just what I asked her, documentation of the origin of any funds that have been lent out at any time to anyone, the origin, right and title, three generations.”
“Otherwise without providing that proof, they in fact are admitting to the point that no such documents exist, because no such loan was ever made. And that we in fact, the money is actually coming from us and based on us. By your actions, you are either proving yourself to be complicit in upholding a debt slavery system or I have given you the opportunity to continue to operate honestly and transparently. Which do you choose?”
And she says “Oh, well, I…uh…I’m gonna have to send this to our legal department. You’re not gonna get an answer today.”
So I’m still waiting.
Lisa: I just, yeah, a round of applause.
Chris: Bob, yeah can you publish that letter Brian? Can you publish that letter? I think that’s brilliantly put because it is any loan every made.
Lisa: Somebody just said in the chat room Bob that you should teach a class and say listen to this 20 times a week.
Brian: I’ll go through, I’ll go back to the archives and I will, or gosh if anybody listening wants to go back through the archives and type that up what Bob just said.
Chris: Well, Bob’s got it in a letter. He was reading a letter.
Bob: It’s basically an adaptation of the request for origin of funds.
Chris: Yeah, except you’re asking about all loans not just yours.
Bob: Yes.
Chris: Heather’s was oriented towards investigating the loan that she was involved with, that’s where that came from. Bob’s just extended it out rightfully so to any loan. That really throws down the glove, because its saying prove that you ever made an honest transaction. Show me one. And they can’t. That’s actually hilarious.
Bob: Well, you know they asked me where the origin of my funds were, so I thought turn around was fair play…show me yours.
Chris: Exactly. Cuz it’s standing in front of you.
Bob: And by the way I did give her paperwork showing where the origin of my funds were duly secured. She hasn’t yet, so…
Brian: So big point of the story being is that Kiri’s not the only one. Bob’s not the only one. When I talked to Steve today, D and Heather know of a few other people that have done the exact same thing. As far as the process of releasing the actual DOV documents, you gotta imagine everybody that’s listening to this call, virtually everyone, maybe not everyone right away, because they don’t want to be the first to jump in but virtually everyone that’s in the chat room that’s gonna listen to this call once those DOV documents are officially out, they’re going to the bank. It’s gonna be a floodgate. Right now, what’s happening is the stage is being set for that very thing to take place.
Chris: Exactly. And the work that Bob has done and that Kiri has done is helping us develop a library of conversations that we can use because we’ll be in front of different people. We’ll throw back different things and we’re going to have a whole range of ideas and ways to put it right back in their lap. Prove who the creditor is. Prove that you’ve been doing the right thing all these years. Oh, you can’t? Well, I can prove that I hold the value and here is mine.
- Justin
Source:
http://i-uv.com/bob-wright-the-docs-bob-created-to-access-a-small-portion-of-his-value/
Labels:
Banking,
Bob Wright,
certificates,
deposit of value,
documents,
dov,
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com,
money,
nesara,
new financial system,
OPPT,
sitsshow,
stillness in the storm,
the one people
Post-Manning Verdict, Glenn Greenwald of The Guardian reams CNN anchors two new ones
Post-Manning Verdict, Glenn Greenwald of The Guardian reams CNN anchors two new ones
July 31, 2013
Thanks to Exopermaculture for the pointer on this one. This is just too funny not to post :) ~BK
In-Joy the Show Wed 7/31 w/Special Carmelle Migliore
In-Joy the Show Wed 7/31 w/Special Carmelle Migliore
July 31, 2013
Join hosts Judy Vancil Jandora, and Brian Kelly tonight at 7pm EST for In~Joy, the Show. Our guest tonight will be Carmelle Migliore. New Co-Host of The Transitioning with Bob Wright.
Carmelle, as a Numerologist and Esoteric Translator Joyfully brings forward her natural intuitive gifts and a lifetime of personal observations and studies in Mysticism, Spirituality, and Holistic Healing, in the descriptions and translations of the Numbers and cycles (in Time).
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thecollectiveimagination/2013/07/31/in-joy-the-show-1
About our guest tonight: PS she will be taking callers for brief numeralogical personal readings for part of the show!!!!
"Numerologist and Esoteric Translator Carmelle Migliore, Joyfully brings forward her natural intuitive gifts and a lifetime of personal observations and studies in Mysticism, Spirituality, and Holistic Healing, in the descriptions and translations of the Numbers and cycles (in Time). Carmelle presents Time and it's gifts, as an easy tool for grasping and returning to Absolute NOW Presence, which is required for personal and collective intentional manifestations in the New Time reality experience platform.
As an experiential student of this simple language of the Numbers in Time, Carmelle offers a supportive and compassionate ear and simplified descriptors and perspectives of our cyclic Time opportunities, and insight on how to recognize and access the potentials within them. She is ever encouraging of our personal and collective processes (in Time), as we grow OUT of Time toward more intentional personal Now focus and Creativity on an Eternally expansive journey, as Multi-dimensional Creator Beings playing in a holographic reality. Carmelle is available for private Timing consultations and her current body of focus and work can be seen at :..
http://theempressoftime.blogspot.com/ and .http://thenumbersintime.blogspot.com/
Humanity is in the midst of the great shift of the ages, prophesied and written about in many ancient text throughout the world. Our options now are to fall into the old paradigm of fear that brings pain, or the feel freedom of love that brings JOY.
Join hosts, Judy Jandora and Brian Kelly each week as they share their upbeat stories and laughter along with some well earned wisdom to help uplift your spirit,s as well as offer some tools to use in your daily lives.
BE In~Joy! You ARE LOVE!
Humanity is in the midst of the great shift of the ages, prophesied and written about in many ancient text throughout the world. Our options now are to fall into the old paradigm of fear that brings pain, or the feel freedom of love that brings JOY.
Join hosts, Judy Jandora and Brian Kelly each week as they share their upbeat stories and laughter along with some well earned wisdom to help uplift your spirit,s as well as offer some tools to use in your daily lives.
BE In~Joy! You ARE LOVE!
DARPA to Genetically Engineer Humans by Adding a 47th Chromosome
DARPA to Genetically Engineer Humans by Adding a 47th Chromosome
July 31, 2013
Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton
Activist Post
We’re no molecular biologists over here, but have you ever seen the sci-fi flick Gattaca?
In that 1997 film, society is structured around eugenics as people are bioengineered to be ‘perfect specimens’, and one’s entire life and position in the world is based on their genetics. Those conceived naturally without genetic screening are proclaimed “invalid” and only allowed menial jobs, despite the innate talents and skills they may possess. Alternately, the 2011 movie In Time portrays a dystopic future where humans are genetically programmed to stop aging at 25 and could live forever — so long as they earn enough “time credits” to afford to stay alive; the poor perish swiftly under an artificially skyrocketing cost of living that times out their clocks, while the rich who steer the technocracy are gaming the system and living indefinitely.
Such nightmare scenarios place obvious restrictions on the natural right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Back in reality, alarmingly similar ends are being pursued.
DARPA, the Department of Defense’s research arm, has just put out a new solicitation for a project called, “Advanced Tools for Mammalian Genome Engineering” on the government’s Federal Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) site.
This project isn’t just for engineering any mammal’s genome, however; it’s specifically for the bioengineering of humans.
The proposal explains the project’s details:
The ability to deliver exogenous DNA to mammalian cell lines is a fundamental tool in the development of advanced therapeutics, vaccines, and cellular diagnostics, as well as for basic biological and biomedical research… The successful development of technologies for rapid introduction of large DNA vectors into human cell lines will enable the ability to engineer much more complex functionalities into human cell lines than are currently possible.
The project’s stated objective is to “improve the utility of Human Artificial Chromosomes (HACs).” (Gallows humor jokes about how DARPA wants to literally HAC(k) you can be made at any time.) AWikipedia entry explains in relatively plain language what a HAC is and what it does:
A human artificial chromosome (HAC) is a microchromosome that can act as a new chromosome in a population of human cells. That is, instead of 46 chromosomes, the cell could have 47 with the 47th being very small, roughly 6-10 megabases in size, and able to carry new genes introduced by human researchers.
So DARPA and its team of associated scientists want to introduce an entirely new 47th chromosome into human genetics as a vector platform for inserting bio-alterations and wholesale genetic “improvements” into our DNA.
The agency hopes that development of a new chromosome will allow a solution to the limitations of current “state-of-the-art” gene transfer technologies (including plasmids, adenovirus-, lentivirus-, and retrovirus-vectors, cDNA, and minigene constructs). The proposal explains that existing approaches must be improved due to known drawbacks in the scientists’ failure to control their results, causing a few minor major problems:
These include random DNA insertion into the host genome, variation in stable integration sites between cell lines, variation in the copy number and expression level of DNA that is delivered, limitations on the number and size of DNA constructs that can be delivered, and immunological responses to foreign DNA.
Yet these techniques are already in use? How reassuring.
Ever hear the term ‘playing God’? Scientists who work in these fields not only refer to themselves as “genome engineers,” but “biological designers” in their journal articles. This January 2013 piece in the journal Molecular Systems Biology introduces the topic with a chilling description:
The phrase ‘genome-scale engineering’ invokes a future in which organisms are custom designed to serve humanity. Yet humans have sculpted the genomes of domesticated plants and animals for generations. Darwin’s contemporary William Youatt described selective breeding as ‘that which enables the agriculturalist, not only to modify the character of his flock, but to change it altogether. It is the magician’s wand, by means of which he may summon into life whatever form and mold he pleases’ (Youatt, 1837).
It’s impossible to even compile an accurate listing of all the potential slippery slopes at play here, yet it is clear that this entails a momentous grasp at controlling life, which not only empowers an already dictatorial technocratic elite, but emboldens a delusional and destructive cadre intent on overwriting the existing species now on Earth.
Watch the 30-second promo video below where an investment firm (with their creepy all seeing eye logo) nonchalantly projects that within 50 years, science will displace natural life by a factor of 50-to-1 with artificial lab-created species – including plants, animals, humans, bacteria and viruses.
Fidelity Investments Forecasts the Creation of 50x More Synthetic Biological Species than Known Natural Species
Through DARPA, our government funds a laundry list of projects to gain technocratic control of the future that reads more like a summary of the latest sci-fi horror film plots. Case in point: just today Activist Post reported "Secret DARPA Mind Control Project Revealed: Leaked Document".
When looking at one DARPA project to perfect mind control techniques — or a second DARPA project to study the human hormone oxytocin to ‘improve’ our response to government propaganda — or a third DARPA brain interface project that would literally turn soldiers into cyborgs, it’s creepy enough. However, when looking at all of these projects together as a combined effort … it raises chilling questions as to what kind of dystopic, technocratic future they are forcing us into.
These developments only include a small sampling of what we know is admittedly going on. Who knows what is actually taking place behind the scenes.
Exactly how many far-reaching and potentially disastrous implications of our government literally playing God are there?
Aaron and Melissa created TruthstreamMedia.com, where this article first appeared, as an outlet to examine the news, place it in a broader context, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, grasp the underlying factors, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free...
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Removing the Shackles: A Chart is Worth a Million Words
Removing the Shackles: A Chart is Worth a Million Words
July 30, 2013
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-chart-is-worth-million-words_30.html
I'd say I'm shocked by how absolutely CRAZY this info is....but nothing really shocks me anymore when it comes to fraud and corruption lol ~BK
With huge thanx to the research team.... who are having an absolute blast asking "What do I know?" and then clicking on a link and discovering all sorts of fun stuff!!! I dont' even know if it's possible to formulate an article around all that they have dug up and discovered and dragged out from under the carpet. I might just have to post an article that is entirely made up of links and say "Have fun with this!!".
A picture may be worth a thousand words.... but a chart is worth a million!!!
This first set of charts is from here: http://fairwhistleblower.ca/content/revolving-door-between-us-government-big-business
Now, this next one is a doozy!!! just for the fun of it I'll put the picture of the chart here, but you'll have to click on the link, which will take you to the original so that you can zooooooom in!!
http://stopsyjonizmowi.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/bilderberg.jpg
http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/images/corporate_community/Citigroup_corp_L1.gif
Yea.... this is another one where you really might need to go to the original link to truly see the astoundingness of this chart: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoharma/97214235/sizes/o/in/photostream/
Courtesy Notice Success Story -- $32,194 Loan Waived by Key Bank
Courtesy Notice Success Story -- $32,194 Loan Waived by Key Bank
July 30, 2013
I received this story from Barry, a contact on Facebook a few days ago. For anyone not yet familiar with the Courtesy Notice document, the main intent and purpose is to bring an end to the harassing letters and phone calls by creditors and collection agencies. However, as of recently banks are beginning to offer much more by way of benefit to the alleged borrower. Considering all loans are fraud, whereas the credit is created within the system with our wet ink signature on the promissory note, all those representing the banks (which are now foreclosed entities) attempting to collect the alleged debt can now be held personally liable for their actions. Once informed of their legal standing, set forth by the Courtesy Notice, they have an opportunity to discontinue the collection process. Or, disregard it and continue, binding the contract (Courtesy Notice), and are now subject to damages payable in troy ounces of silver. If any further calls or letters are made or sent, invoices can be served for damages on behalf of the client (you). The Courtesy Notice document, in its entirety, can be reviewed at the bottom of this post.
Over the past few months, I have heard personal accounts of both wins and losses from those who have initiated this process. What it boils down to is the receiving party and how they choose to handle the matter internally. My personal opinion is that if ANY bank opts to forgive/waive/reverse the alleged debt in any way, there is a considerable amount of clout that needs to be given to the content of the CN document. History has shown banks don't just relinquish their phony debt for no good reason. Critics to this document will say, "you received the money, goods, property, etc. therefore you have to pay for it!" Actually, this is not true. To assume so, is to not have a complete grasp on the inner workings of money mechanics and how debt is created.
"A deposit created through lending is a debt that has to be paid on demand of the depositor, just the same as the debt arising from a customer's deposit of checks or currency in the bank. Of course they do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts. – Federal Reserve Bank, Chicago, Modern Money Mechanics, p. 6
Banks are prohibited from lending their ‘own money’ from their own assets, or from other depositors. So from where did the $$$ come? The contract we signed (our promissory note) was converted into a ‘negotiable instrument’ by the bank and became an asset on the bank’s accounting books. According to the UCC 1-201(24) and 3-104, it was our signature on the note which made it $$$.
Our promissory note (‘money’) was taken, recorded as an asset of the bank, and sold by the bank for cash without ‘equal valuable consideration’ given to us for our note. The bank gave us a deposit slip as a receipt for the money we gave them, just as the bank would normally provide when we make a deposit to the bank. It then created an account at the bank which would contain this $$$ which we just created. A check on this account was issued with our signature and this account is the source of funds behind the cheque which we received as a ‘loan’.
The bank risked none of its own assets in the so-called ‘loan’ to us; rather it used our note to pay the seller, in order to raise an asset for itself, and also used the face value of our note as ‘principal’ which it claims it ‘lent’ us and against which it charged interest. Consideration on the part of the bank is non-existent so the bank has nothing to lose. It can not possibly sustain a loss. Since consideration is essential to an enforceable contract and the note was obtained from us via fraud, the entire transaction/ contract is fraudulent.
Mortgage contracts are written in such a way to appear as if the bank lent us funds before they received our promissory note/ mortgage contract so that the bank can use it as a receipt which they can sell. The contract reads, “For a loan I have received...”, but, you haven’t received it yet. So in fact, we signed and gave the mortgage contract/note to the bank prior to their giving us the funds. So, the application for the loan created the funds (it has our signature on it) and the note (with our signature) covered the funds to ‘repay’ the loan. Again, constructive fraud." - Mary Elizabeth Croft
"The actual process of money creation takes place primarily in banks ... bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving their promise to pay, or bank notes, to borrowers. In this way banks began to create money. Transaction deposits are the modern counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries crediting deposits of borrowers, which the borrowers in turn could ‘spend’ by writing checks, thereby ‘printing’ their own money." – Modern Money Mechanics, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
"It is well enough that the people of this nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." – Henry Ford
So, you see we "the people" are not the debtors after all, we are and have always been the creditors. When we take out loans, not only do we have to pay the bank back for money that WE created, we have to pay it back with interest! Critics of these Truths need to stop looking at it from the perspective of, we're robbing or manipulating the system trying to get things for free, this is simply not the case. Don't take my word for it, go out and conduct your own research. What you will find is that we have been pre-paying for everything we could ever want and so much more since birth, when our birth certificates were used to create our Strawman accounts.
“The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.” - Wayne Dyer
I post these stories in hopes that it empowers those who read to share and start taking action. If we start collectively defending ourselves against financial slavery and control, the very revolution Henry Ford mentions above will be upon us in no time. Albert Einstein said, "the world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." When we keep paying into a system that is controlling every aspect of our lives we silently give our consent to our controllers, giving the message "it's all good, keep oppressing me, I'm cool with it". Not me...not anymore. I hope that Barry's story below inspires you as it has me. ~BK
This is the email I received from him:
I filed a UCC-1 financing form and secured all my property. This was done in my resident state as it is also my birth state. I stopped paying in Nov.. I found out about OPPT in Jan.. When I got the first notice, I sent the CN to the CEO (alleged). When I received a call about collection I asked their names and made sure they worked at the address I sent the other mail to. I sent them all return receipt. I sent a bill twice after receiving 2 calls. I sent CNs to the calling reps so they understood. I sent the 3rd bill with a "past due" notice about 2 weeks ago. I sent that to the CEO (alleged) also. Today I got an email telling me my statement was available online. When I checked the balance was $0.00.
This is his collection notice he received on March 23, 2013, showing a balance of $32,194.57...
This is Barry's account as of July 27, 2013, showing the same ending acct # of 562047, as having a balance of 0.00...
Skeptics will say, "well, he probably paid it off." Sorry folks, not this time...
Now that you have seen this for yourselves, it begs the question; if the UCC filings and foreclosures set forth by the now reconciled One People's Public Trust are not legitimate, why would Key Bank be inclined to release over $32,000 of alleged debt?
Here's a fact: ALL LOANS ARE FRAUD. Including but not limited to: auto loans, mortgages, credit cards, student loans, home equity lines of credit, etc. Be smart but take action. Just remember, at this point in time, there is no guarantee this will work, as it largely depends on the banks legal department and how they choose to handle the matter. Only YOU can be responsible for your actions. I have challenged Chase with my car loan and have not made a payment since February, not a single phone call since I submitted my CN.
Here is a link to Shirley's story of Chase releasing a lien on her mortgage of over $99,000.
And the Courtesy Notice should any be readers be so inclined to stop paying energy into the system...
Message from Brian: If you are a fan of my work and would like to see it continue please consider making a donation to my blog using the paypal link on the right. No obligation, every little bit helps :) ~Brian
Monday, July 29, 2013
Kiri Campbell Trial: Updates from Inside the Courtroom
(My mistake...picture above is from the 1975 Maori Land March)
Kiri Campbell Trial: Inside the Courtroom
July 29, 2013These up to the minute updates are being shared live from inside the courtroom today. I also share a comment from a thread on FB I posted earlier, which I share here in full transparency. We will be discussing further on the radio show tonight, make sure to tune in. ~BK
Turikatuku Gumada 10.04am there is screaming
Like · Reply · 2 minutes ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.04am everyone is yelling, the woman are raising their voices. They are telling the judge to release her NOW NOW NOW
Like · Reply · 1 · about a minute ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.04am One of our woman are reading out our standing authority
Like · Reply · 2 minutes ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.04am everyone is yelling, the woman are raising their voices. They are telling the judge to release her NOW NOW NOW
Like · Reply · 1 · about a minute ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.04am One of our woman are reading out our standing authority
Turikatuku Gumada 10.06am The authority of the court and judge is being challenged by our people right now
Like · Reply · 1 · about a minute ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.07am They are telling the judge that he/she is ignoring the facts
Like · Reply · 1 · a few seconds ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.08am Woman telling police to back off.
Like · Reply · 1 · about a minute ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.07am They are telling the judge that he/she is ignoring the facts
Like · Reply · 1 · a few seconds ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.08am Woman telling police to back off.
Turikatuku Gumada 10.09am Our people have a right to take Kiri right now and the judge is being told right now
Turikatuku Gumada 10.10am They are being told they can't hold her. Geez if I was the judge I would let her go
Turikatuku Gumada 10.11am There is currently an uproar. A Maori woman is reading out the facts to the Judge....Kiri is non-stop reading our her standing authority and rights
Turikatuku Gumada 10.11am There is currently an uproar. A Maori woman is reading out the facts to the Judge....Kiri is non-stop reading our her standing authority and rights
Turikatuku Gumada 10.13am Currently this is being read out to the judge by one of our Elderly Woman....Is it not true by the maxims of law : Ignorance of the law is no excuse ?
Is it not true by the maxims of law : Everyone is equal under the law ?
Is it not true by the maxims of law : Truth stands sovereign in law ?
Is it not true that the Colonial Government of New Zealand has no written constitution and therefore by convention needs the consent by both parties agreement to contract ?
Is it not true that the Colonial Government of New Zealand has no Allodium title or any true Royal Estate to act as the governing body to apply The Rule of Law by The Law of The Land ?
Is it not true that the Colonial Government of New Zealand has never been given a mandate by any referendum by the people of New Zealand to be The Government of New Zealand ?
Is it not true that The 1835 Declaration Of Independence by King William IV. in trade with The Paramount Chiefs of The Northern Maori Indigenous Tribes is supreme in standing in The Dominion Of New Zealand ?
Is it not true that the 1835 Declaration Of Independence has its own flag with Royal Assent from King William IV.
Is it not true that The 1835 Declaration of Independence by Royal Assent upholds a Flag that was raised on the land and had a twenty one gun salute at Waitangi in March 1834 from Capt Lambert of the British Man of War Ship H.M.S. Alligator and witnessed by vessels from The United States Of America and The Republic Of France ?
Is it not true that The 1835 Declaration Of Independence upholds The Law Of The Land ?
Is it not true that The Treaty Of Waitangi was brought to New Zealand to bring commerce to the Dominion ?
Is it not true that The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi was never signed by Queen Victoria therefore has no Royal Assent ?
Is it not true that The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi never had a twenty one gun salute?
Is it not true that The Treaty Of Waitangi does not uphold The Law Of The Land by Royal Assent ?
Is it not true that The Treaty Of Waitangi was brought to this Dominion by a British Naval Officer William Hobson to bring commerce by the laws of the sea ?
Is it not true that the laws of the sea are subordinate to The Law Of Land ?
Is it not true that the laws of the sea brought about by British Admiralty and Maritime laws was used as an instrument by The Corporation called THE CITY OF LONDON known as THE CROWN to bring about commerce throughout The British Empire ?
Is it not true that The Corporation CROWN is different and separate from The Sovereign Crown of H.M. Queen Elizabeth II. ?
Is it not true that THE CITY OF LONDON is a Corporation called THE CROWN ?
Is it not true that THE CROWN CORPORATION is separate from The Sovereign Crown of H.M. Queen Elizabeth II. ?
Is it not true that the present Colonial Government of New Zealand is operating under Maritime / Admiralty laws ?
Is it not true that the present Colonial Government of New Zealand and its legislated laws, is operating under subordinate laws as indicated in The New Zealand 1988/89 Imperial Laws Application Act ?
Is it not true that the District and High Courts under the jurisdiction of The New Zealand Colonial Government is operating under the subordinate system of admiralty process jurisprudence and not The Law Of The Land ?
Is it not true that the lease of the land in accordance with The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi finished in 1939 ?
Is it not true that the system of jurisprudence is subordinate to H.M. Queen Elizabeth II. Royal Laws of Hierarchy up holding The Laws Of The Land ?
Is it not true that all judges in both the District and High Courts of this Dominion called New Zealand by the symbolism of their black robes are operating under burnt trampled charcoal subordinate law ?
Is it not true that the term charcoal law came from the British historic event, when the Red Robed Law Lords of H.M. The King, overruled laws bought about by new law reforms, subject to The British Industrial Revolution, which tried to supersede H.M. The Kings Laws of Hierarchy upheld by The Holy Bible, to which they in turn were burnt and trampled on the parchment the new laws were written on ?
Is it not true that the New Zealand Colonial Government is an extension of the Australian New South Wales Government and therefore not The Sovereign Government of this Dominion called New Zealand ?
Is it not true that the present New Zealand Flag with the British Union Jack in the upper left hand corner with the red inserted stars of the southern cross on the remainder of the flag, presently upheld by The New Zealand Colonial Government, was initially taken from a Wellington yacht club and has no Royal Assent ?
Is it not true that The New Zealand Colonial Government is operating under a corporation named HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND ?
Is it not true that HER MAGESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND is a corporation upholding bankruptcy, which in turn is holding the debt and liability between The New Zealand Debt Management Office and The United States Securities and Exchange Commission ?
Is it not true that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND file number with The United States Securities and Exchange Commission is 0000216105 ?
Is it not true that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND and The Living Sovereign Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. are not the same ?
Is it not true that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND is not sovereign ?
Is it not true that The New Zealand Colonial Government and its justice system is bankrupt ?
Is it not true that The United States Securities and Exchange Commission is connected to The United States Federal Reserve Bank ?
Is not true that The United States Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned ?
Is it not true that all bank notes, credit cards, cheques issued and authorized by The New Zealand Reserve Bank, no longer have any true intrinsic value based on gold or silver bullion, but are introduced as a debt and liability to the people of New Zealand ?
Is it not true that all judges in the District and High Courts take an oath to The Living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II. and Her Majesties Heirs and Successors on the Holy Bible ?
Is it not true that The Living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II. took an oath on The Stone Of Destiny or otherwise known as Jacobs Pillar, which is inserted in the wooden coronation chair of King Edward I. , to uphold The Laws of Almighty God and to Her Subjects by these laws as Defender Of The Faith ?
Is it not true that The Present living Monarch H.M. Queen Elizabeth II is of The Royal Blood Line of Zarah to the line of Pharaz to King David Of Israel to The Savior Jesus The Christ or as in the Hebrew language known and named as "Yeshua" ?
Is it not true that the Common Law Of England prevails in the laws of this Dominion called New Zealand, as indicated in section five (5) of the 1988/89 Imperial Laws Application Act ?
Is it not true that The Holy Bible is the highest statute in all New Zealand Courts of Law ?
Is it not true that to uphold a fraud is a criminal offence ?
Is it not true that for all public servants making and upholding a sworn oath to the living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II, to usurp their authority above their sworn oath to the living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II is an act of High Treason ?
Is it not true that The 1571 Treasons Act upholds the death penalty ?
Is it not true that no one is above the Law Of The Land but Almighty God ?
Is it not true by the maxims of law : Everyone is equal under the law ?
Is it not true by the maxims of law : Truth stands sovereign in law ?
Is it not true that the Colonial Government of New Zealand has no written constitution and therefore by convention needs the consent by both parties agreement to contract ?
Is it not true that the Colonial Government of New Zealand has no Allodium title or any true Royal Estate to act as the governing body to apply The Rule of Law by The Law of The Land ?
Is it not true that the Colonial Government of New Zealand has never been given a mandate by any referendum by the people of New Zealand to be The Government of New Zealand ?
Is it not true that The 1835 Declaration Of Independence by King William IV. in trade with The Paramount Chiefs of The Northern Maori Indigenous Tribes is supreme in standing in The Dominion Of New Zealand ?
Is it not true that the 1835 Declaration Of Independence has its own flag with Royal Assent from King William IV.
Is it not true that The 1835 Declaration of Independence by Royal Assent upholds a Flag that was raised on the land and had a twenty one gun salute at Waitangi in March 1834 from Capt Lambert of the British Man of War Ship H.M.S. Alligator and witnessed by vessels from The United States Of America and The Republic Of France ?
Is it not true that The 1835 Declaration Of Independence upholds The Law Of The Land ?
Is it not true that The Treaty Of Waitangi was brought to New Zealand to bring commerce to the Dominion ?
Is it not true that The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi was never signed by Queen Victoria therefore has no Royal Assent ?
Is it not true that The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi never had a twenty one gun salute?
Is it not true that The Treaty Of Waitangi does not uphold The Law Of The Land by Royal Assent ?
Is it not true that The Treaty Of Waitangi was brought to this Dominion by a British Naval Officer William Hobson to bring commerce by the laws of the sea ?
Is it not true that the laws of the sea are subordinate to The Law Of Land ?
Is it not true that the laws of the sea brought about by British Admiralty and Maritime laws was used as an instrument by The Corporation called THE CITY OF LONDON known as THE CROWN to bring about commerce throughout The British Empire ?
Is it not true that The Corporation CROWN is different and separate from The Sovereign Crown of H.M. Queen Elizabeth II. ?
Is it not true that THE CITY OF LONDON is a Corporation called THE CROWN ?
Is it not true that THE CROWN CORPORATION is separate from The Sovereign Crown of H.M. Queen Elizabeth II. ?
Is it not true that the present Colonial Government of New Zealand is operating under Maritime / Admiralty laws ?
Is it not true that the present Colonial Government of New Zealand and its legislated laws, is operating under subordinate laws as indicated in The New Zealand 1988/89 Imperial Laws Application Act ?
Is it not true that the District and High Courts under the jurisdiction of The New Zealand Colonial Government is operating under the subordinate system of admiralty process jurisprudence and not The Law Of The Land ?
Is it not true that the lease of the land in accordance with The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi finished in 1939 ?
Is it not true that the system of jurisprudence is subordinate to H.M. Queen Elizabeth II. Royal Laws of Hierarchy up holding The Laws Of The Land ?
Is it not true that all judges in both the District and High Courts of this Dominion called New Zealand by the symbolism of their black robes are operating under burnt trampled charcoal subordinate law ?
Is it not true that the term charcoal law came from the British historic event, when the Red Robed Law Lords of H.M. The King, overruled laws bought about by new law reforms, subject to The British Industrial Revolution, which tried to supersede H.M. The Kings Laws of Hierarchy upheld by The Holy Bible, to which they in turn were burnt and trampled on the parchment the new laws were written on ?
Is it not true that the New Zealand Colonial Government is an extension of the Australian New South Wales Government and therefore not The Sovereign Government of this Dominion called New Zealand ?
Is it not true that the present New Zealand Flag with the British Union Jack in the upper left hand corner with the red inserted stars of the southern cross on the remainder of the flag, presently upheld by The New Zealand Colonial Government, was initially taken from a Wellington yacht club and has no Royal Assent ?
Is it not true that The New Zealand Colonial Government is operating under a corporation named HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND ?
Is it not true that HER MAGESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND is a corporation upholding bankruptcy, which in turn is holding the debt and liability between The New Zealand Debt Management Office and The United States Securities and Exchange Commission ?
Is it not true that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND file number with The United States Securities and Exchange Commission is 0000216105 ?
Is it not true that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND and The Living Sovereign Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. are not the same ?
Is it not true that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND is not sovereign ?
Is it not true that The New Zealand Colonial Government and its justice system is bankrupt ?
Is it not true that The United States Securities and Exchange Commission is connected to The United States Federal Reserve Bank ?
Is not true that The United States Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned ?
Is it not true that all bank notes, credit cards, cheques issued and authorized by The New Zealand Reserve Bank, no longer have any true intrinsic value based on gold or silver bullion, but are introduced as a debt and liability to the people of New Zealand ?
Is it not true that all judges in the District and High Courts take an oath to The Living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II. and Her Majesties Heirs and Successors on the Holy Bible ?
Is it not true that The Living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II. took an oath on The Stone Of Destiny or otherwise known as Jacobs Pillar, which is inserted in the wooden coronation chair of King Edward I. , to uphold The Laws of Almighty God and to Her Subjects by these laws as Defender Of The Faith ?
Is it not true that The Present living Monarch H.M. Queen Elizabeth II is of The Royal Blood Line of Zarah to the line of Pharaz to King David Of Israel to The Savior Jesus The Christ or as in the Hebrew language known and named as "Yeshua" ?
Is it not true that the Common Law Of England prevails in the laws of this Dominion called New Zealand, as indicated in section five (5) of the 1988/89 Imperial Laws Application Act ?
Is it not true that The Holy Bible is the highest statute in all New Zealand Courts of Law ?
Is it not true that to uphold a fraud is a criminal offence ?
Is it not true that for all public servants making and upholding a sworn oath to the living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II, to usurp their authority above their sworn oath to the living Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II is an act of High Treason ?
Is it not true that The 1571 Treasons Act upholds the death penalty ?
Is it not true that no one is above the Law Of The Land but Almighty God ?
Turikatuku Gumada 10.20am Affected parties wishing to respond appropriately must do so within SEVEN (7) DAYS of service of this notice. Responses must be made under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury no later than SEVEN (7) DAYS from the date of original service.
Failure to respond appropriately will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against myself a Sovereign-on-the-Land known as Kiri of the Campbell family.
Failure to respond appropriately will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against myself a Sovereign-on-the-Land known as Kiri of the Campbell family.
Turikatuku Gumada 10.20am Hand clapping. Innocent until proven guilty just yelled out
Like · Reply · 5 · 9 minutes ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.21am Our Kaumatua [Male Elder] is now talking...again asserting our authority on the land
Like · Reply · 5 · 9 minutes ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.21am Our Kaumatua [Male Elder] is now talking...again asserting our authority on the land
Turikatuku Gumada 10.24am Kiri is asking for her personal property to be returned
Turikatuku Gumada 10.25am they are not responding to questions requesting their identification, standing, authority, identification of law, accommodation agreement. I cannot see or hear the judge.
Like · Reply · 2 · 4 minutes ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.27am I am on a laptop screen hiding behind someone. I am listening in...in the courtroom
Like · Reply · 2 · 4 minutes ago
Turikatuku Gumada 10.27am I am on a laptop screen hiding behind someone. I am listening in...in the courtroom
Turikatuku Gumada 10.33am lost contact.
Turikatuku Gumada 10.40am our people took the court. judge left. we closed the court. but they have kidnapped kiri. trying to find phone number for governor general in nz. can someone Google it for me and post here. urgent
Turikatuku Gumada govenor can help us get kiri released
Turikatuku Gumada 11.28am Meeting is being organised at the house with representatives, Elders, Chief Native Assessor and Marshall. They closed the court. The court won't disclose kiris location. She will be heard by a judge elsewhere and no one can be present. No information is being released. No one can be present in the unknown courthouse location.
Turikatuku Gumada The Govenor General sent a notice to the NZ Hawera Police to release Kiri, but it was ignored
Turikatuku Gumada govenor can help us get kiri released
Turikatuku Gumada 11.28am Meeting is being organised at the house with representatives, Elders, Chief Native Assessor and Marshall. They closed the court. The court won't disclose kiris location. She will be heard by a judge elsewhere and no one can be present. No information is being released. No one can be present in the unknown courthouse location.
Turikatuku Gumada The Govenor General sent a notice to the NZ Hawera Police to release Kiri, but it was ignored
My comment shared on FB:
Let me start off by saying, Bec was fairly accurate above when she made this comment "she was using other 'freeman' docs and techniques already when she stumbled across OPPT, and then she incorporated the UCC filings into her actions in progress." Kiri mentioned this in our interview we published. She was very far along with her own process, having done a considerable amount of her own study with Mary Croft's work, and uncovering for herself the reality of "the people" being the true creditors, not the banks. So, when she stumbled upon OPPT, the UCC filings gave her the last piece of the puzzle she needed....$5 Billion secured for every inbodyment on the planet, to underwrite her personal value within.
So, when XXXX and many others ask the (very logical) question, why did she not just wait for the DOV documents and do this process with a much stronger foot hold to support her efforts? The honest answer is, I don't think she even knew about the documents being created at that point. She was already off to the races. As far as she was concerned, she had everything she needed once she read the UCC filings. Lisa, Heather, Bob, myself and the rest of the crew didn't find out about what she had done until 48 hours after she was left the bank and had been arrested for the first time. (Turns out she may have known about the documents but she wanted to use her own process)
We stood behind her because we knew she was a warrior, with a good heart, a beautiful family who love and adore her, and she deserved to have our support. Here is where the message has become a bit distorted. We never viewed this as an OPPT victory. It is now and has always been a piece of the puzzle. Data to assist in developing the bigger picture at hand. This whole process with the DOV and what Heather is doing in Morocco is a global jigsaw puzzle with more working pieces than I think anyone could ever possibly comprehend. It's like a complex five course meal with one of the most important variables being the timing of the dishes. One wrong move and the desert comes out before the main course and the whole meal is ruined.
From what I know and have heard in bits and pieces from Heather, Kiri's case has provided much needed data for what she is working on with the DOV. What exactly that data is, I'm not exactly sure and she can't talk about it over the phone. I know Heather personally and I trust her and her processes 100%. If she says Kiri's case is important to her work and it's given her the last bit of info that she needs to make this happen, I trust she knows exactly what she's doing....which includes the timing of the release. (When I spoke to D today, she described it as more of an 'order of operations' situation with certain things needing to happen first in order for everything to go as planned)
Where this whole story became a bit messy is when XXXX started to muddy the story with her accusations of Kiri having an agenda to claim sovereignty for the Maori people of NZ. She very well may be, but from my vantage point it's focusing on all the wrong details. Kiri is standing up against the court system and defending her rights against those in power trying to strip them away. SHE DOES NOT CONSENT to abuse and oppression. Her victory in court should be the focus here, not who wrote the announcement for the march through Wellington or what she hopes to gain by way of Freedom for her people.
I hope with all my heart Kiri walks out of the court room tomorrow victorious. I believe that she will. No matter what the outcome, Kiri will always be a hero in my book for standing up for what she believes in. For defending her rights against her oppressors. This is how true change is born. When enough people stand up for what they KNOW is right, the people claim their power back. "People should not fear their governments, governments should fear their people." As long as we are in fear we will always be ruled by the unjust. Kiri did what she did by her own Free Will. Had she contacted any of us ahead of time we surely would have informed her of what Heather is doing with the DOV documents and likely would have suggested she wait. But hindsight being 20/20 that's not what happened b/c THAT'S NOT WHAT WAS MEANT TO HAPPEN. We all know that everything happens for a reasons. What's done is done. We can sit here and collectively wish it didn't go down that way until we're all blue in the face and it won't rewind Kiri's actions. What we all need to do now is support her.
We also need to stop talking about OPPT as a movement that can be compromised by an individual or a group. When you give it the label of a "movement" then you give people power to compromise the integrity of the movement, or be operating within or outside of the "movement". What is happening on the planet right now is bigger than any one person or group. It's bigger than UCC filings or DOV documents. It's about winning back our True Freedom and we have more momentum now than ever before. We are ALL pushing toward the same end goal, when issues arise we don't see eye to eye on, let us not forget that. I hope that helps to clear things up
Here are the NZ media contacts for anyone interested in helping to support getting this story more press:
'john.key@national.org.nz'; 'c.finlayson@parliament.govt.nz'; 'michael.heron@crownlaw.govt.nz'; 'paula.bennettmp@parliament.govt.nz'; 'tuhitia.katene001@cyf.govt.nz'; 'tribunals@justice.govt.nz'; 'hawera.dc@justice.govt.nz; ''info@justice.govt.nz'; 'newplymouth.juryservice@justice.govt.nz'; 'yournews@nzherald.co.nz'; 'web@dompost.co.nz'; 'reporters@press.co.nz'; 'News@WaikatoTimes.co.nz'
AK: Snowden's Dad SCHOOLS Obama, Pelosi, and Holder in Open Letter
Obama Swearing to Uphold the Constitution Dees Illustration |
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Snowden's Dad SCHOOLS Obama, Pelosi, and Holder in Open Letter
Re: Civil Disobedience, Edward J. Snowden, and the Constitution
Dear Mr. President:
You are acutely aware that the history of liberty is a history of civil disobedience to unjust laws or practices. As Edmund Burke sermonized, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”
Civil disobedience is not the first, but the last option. Henry David Thoreau wrote with profound restraint in Civil Disobedience: “If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine.”
Thoreau’s moral philosophy found expression during the Nuremburg trials in which “following orders” was rejected as a defense. Indeed, military law requires disobedience to clearly illegal orders.
A dark chapter in America’s World War II history would not have been written if the then United States Attorney General had resigned rather than participate in racist concentration camps imprisoning 120,000 Japanese American citizens and resident aliens.
Civil disobedience to the Fugitive Slave Act and Jim Crow laws provoked the end of slavery and the modern civil rights revolution.
We submit that Edward J. Snowden’s disclosures of dragnet surveillance of Americans under § 215 of the Patriot Act, § 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments, or otherwise were sanctioned by Thoreau’s time-honored moral philosophy and justifications for civil disobedience. Since 2005, Mr. Snowden had been employed by the intelligence community. He found himself complicit in secret, indiscriminate spying on millions of innocent citizens contrary to the spirit if not the letter of the First and Fourth Amendments and the transparency indispensable to self-government. Members of Congress entrusted with oversight remained silent or Delphic. Mr. Snowden confronted a choice between civic duty and passivity. He may have recalled the injunction of Martin Luther King, Jr.: “He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.” Mr. Snowden chose duty. Your administration vindictively responded with a criminal complaint alleging violations of the Espionage Act.
From the commencement of your administration, your secrecy of the National Security Agency’s Orwellian surveillance programs had frustrated a national conversation over their legality, necessity, or morality. That secrecy (combined with congressional nonfeasance) provoked Edward’s disclosures, which sparked a national conversation which you have belatedly and cynically embraced. Legislation has been introduced in both the House of Representatives and Senate to curtail or terminate the NSA’s programs, and the American people are being educated to the public policy choices at hand. A commanding majority now voice concerns over the dragnet surveillance of Americans that Edward exposed and you concealed. It seems mystifying to us that you are prosecuting Edward for accomplishing what you have said urgently needed to be done!
The right to be left alone from government snooping–the most cherished right among civilized people—is the cornerstone of liberty. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson served as Chief Prosecutor at Nuremburg. He came to learn of the dynamics of the Third Reich that crushed a free society, and which have lessons for the United States today.
Writing in Brinegar v. United States, Justice Jackson elaborated:
These, I protest, are not mere second-class rights but belong in the catalog of indispensable freedoms. Among deprivations of rights, none is so effective in cowing a population, crushing the spirit of the individual and putting terror in every heart. Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government. And one need only briefly to have dwelt and worked among a people possessed of many admirable qualities but deprived of these rights to know that the human personality deteriorates and dignity and self-reliance disappear where homes, persons and possessions are subject at any hour to unheralded search and seizure by the police.The Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
We thus find your administration’s zeal to punish Mr. Snowden’s discharge of civic duty to protect democratic processes and to safeguard liberty to be unconscionable and indefensible.
We are also appalled at your administration’s scorn for due process, the rule of law, fairness, and the presumption of innocence as regards Edward.
On June 27, 2013, Mr. Fein wrote a letter to the Attorney General stating that Edward’s father was substantially convinced that he would return to the United States to confront the charges that have been lodged against him if three cornerstones of due process were guaranteed. The letter was not an ultimatum, but an invitation to discuss fair trial imperatives. The Attorney General has sneered at the overture with studied silence.
We thus suspect your administration wishes to avoid a trial because of constitutional doubts about application of the Espionage Act in these circumstances, and obligations to disclose to the public potentially embarrassing classified information under the Classified Information Procedures Act.
Your decision to force down a civilian airliner carrying Bolivian President Eva Morales in hopes of kidnapping Edward also does not inspire confidence that you are committed to providing him a fair trial. Neither does your refusal to remind the American people and prominent Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate like House Speaker John Boehner, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann,and Senator Dianne Feinstein that Edward enjoys a presumption of innocence. He should not be convicted before trial. Yet Speaker Boehner has denounced Edward as a “traitor.”
Ms. Pelosi has pontificated that Edward “did violate the law in terms of releasing those documents.” Ms. Bachmann has pronounced that, “This was not the act of a patriot; this was an act of a traitor.” And Ms. Feinstein has decreed that Edward was guilty of “treason,” which is defined in Article III of the Constitution as “levying war” against the United States, “or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”
You have let those quadruple affronts to due process pass unrebuked, while you have disparaged Edward as a “hacker” to cast aspersion on his motivations and talents. Have you forgotten the Supreme Court’s gospel in Berger v. United States that the interests of the government “in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done?”
We also find reprehensible your administration’s Espionage Act prosecution of Edward for disclosures indistinguishable from those which routinely find their way into the public domain via your high level appointees for partisan political advantage. Classified details of your predator drone protocols, for instance, were shared with the New York Times with impunity to bolster your national security credentials. Justice Jackson observed in Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York: “The framers of the Constitution knew, and we should not forget today, that there is no more effective practical guaranty against arbitrary and unreasonable government than to require that the principles of law which officials would impose upon a minority must be imposed generally.”
In light of the circumstances amplified above, we urge you to order the Attorney General to move to dismiss the outstanding criminal complaint against Edward, and to support legislation to remedy the NSA surveillance abuses he revealed. Such presidential directives would mark your finest constitutional and moral hour.
Sincerely,
Bruce Fein
Counsel for Lon Snowden
Lon Snowden
Bruce Fein & Associates, Inc.
722 12th Street, N.W., 4th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: 703-963-4968
bruce@thelichfieldgroup.com
Posted at: http://www.activistpost.com/2013/07/snowdens-dad-schools-obama-pelosi-and.html?m=1
The Story Of Your Enslavement: Meet Your Strawman
The Story Of Your Enslavement: Meet Your Strawman
July 29, 2013
Many of the readers here will already be familiar with the Strawman; the corporate fiction created by our Birth Certificate. The information I have to share here is a pretty simple breakdown and can be shared with those who might still be skeptical. For anyone looking to do more research on this, I highly recommend reading Mary Elizabeth Croft's free e-book here. ~BK
A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. It wasn’t the
world being round that agitated people but that the world wasn’t flat. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic. – Dresden James
Registration vs. Recording
“Registration” comes from Latin “rex, regis” etc. meaning regal. So think about what occurs to
whatever you ‘register’ – you hand legal title over to the Crown. When you register anything with the public,
it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title – the right to use,
not own, and for that use you will pay a ‘use’ tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as opposed to lawful taxes – excise and impost. So that it doesn’t appear that the government now owns the
property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won’t
suspect it, however, the NAME is owned by the government. If you choose rather to record your legal title to your property with the public, you maintain your status as Title Owner. This is one of the most important
things you can ever learn for the sake of your commercial affairs.
The best example of the effects of registration is the birth certificate. A bankrupt entity – city, state/
province, country – cannot operate in commerce. So how do they manage? Since USA/CA have been
bankrupt for decades, having no substance such as gold and silver to back it, the only asset it has are men and women and our labour. We are the collateral for the interest on the loan of the World Bank. Each of us is registered, via the application for a birth certificate. The Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate and the bond is sold at a securities exchange and bought by the FRB/BoC, which then uses it as collateral to issue bank notes. The bond is held in trust for the Feds at the Depository Trust Corporation. We are the surety on said bonds. Our labour/energy is then payable at some future date. Hence we become the ‘transmitting utility’ for the transmission of energy. The USG/CAG, in order to provide necessary goods and services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labour, life and body of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of us all. We became nothing more than ‘human resources’ and collateral for the debt. This was without our knowledge and/or our consent, via the filing (registration) of our birth certificates. When mums apply for a birth certificate, the application is registered. The legal title of her baby is then transferred from mum to the State. Mum is left with equitable title of her baby whom she can use for a fee – a ‘use tax’ – and since the property does not belong to her, she has to treat it in the manner which the owner wants.
Colonel Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be
implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson
(President 1913 – 1921), Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels(property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate)to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a
contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America. – Colonel Edward Mandell House
This is why I coach those who intend to ‘marry’ not to sign anything. Centuries ago, a man put a ring on
a woman’s finger and declared, “With this ring, I thee wed”. Family members were the witnesses and that
was it. There was no state-issued licence to sign ... frightful! Children can be taken from their parents
because of the marriage licence. Do not invite into your private contract a third party which happens to be
public, cares not about the interests of the other two parties, and has every legal right to force them to
acquiesce to its demands. Your marriage ceases to be your own; the third party will tell you if and when you
can end the marriage; the third party will dictate that your children will:
1. require a birth certificate and SSN
2. require a gov’t-directed (AMA) doctor to attend to his health,
3. be vaccinated by mandate,
4. attend the Public Scool System,
5. be prescribed and drugged by Ritalin,
6. sign up with the armed forces, etc.
Your child will be a ‘ward of the state’ and the state will have prior say in what IT thinks is best for your
child – you will not have jurisdiction over him.
The birth certificate created a FICTION (the name of the baby in upper case letters). The state/ province
sells the birth certificate to the Commerce Department of the corporations of USA/CA, which in turn places a bond on the birth certificate thereby making it a negotiable instrument, and placing the fiction, called a
STRAWMAN, into the warehouse of the corporations of USA/CA. Representation for the created fiction
was given to the BAR (British Accredited Registry/Regency), owned and operated by the Crown, for the
purpose of contracting the fiction (which most of us think is ourselves) into a third party action. Do not
underestimate the power behind this trick. It is to con us into contracting with the feds so that they can
‘legally’ confiscate our property. All these contracts have only our signatures on them because corporate
fictions cannot contract (only natural beings have the right to contract – and the right not to contract).
Because there is no full disclosure – we are never told that we have just signed away what we believe to be
our property – these contracts are fraudulent, and hence, we are still the lawful owner and the profit earned by the feds from selling securities (our property) belongs to us and must go into a fund for our benefit,
otherwise it would be fraud. Not wanting to be charged with fraud, the feds had to create a remedy for us ...
and hope we wouldn’t discover it.
For decades, through its ‘public’ school system, the government has managed to deceive us about some
very important facts. All facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing influence in our
lives and are controlled by government and its agencies, via the issuance of licences. We have slowly and
systematically been led to believe that any form of our names represents us, which is not so.
Over the Hump...
Over the Hump...
July 28, 2013
On the In-Joy show last week we discussed the importance of asking for help when we need it. There are many people in this world who are far more comfortable giving than they are receiving. I am definitely one of those people. When I left my job back in February, blog revenue (from the ridiculous advertisements) and offering distance Reiki healing sessions to my readers filled the income gap quite nicely. This month though, I just crunched the numbers and I'm a few hundred dollars shy of making my minimal expenses. My intention is to continue my work here full time in service to Humanity for as long as it takes. Only for anyone who is in a position to do so, any donations at this time would be so greatly appreciated. There is a Paypal link on the lower right column of the blog. Every little bit helps. My intuition tells me that this will be the last time I ever have to reach out for any financial assistance :)
The signs of great change are everywhere...
All we have to do is open our eyes and look. I was telling a friend the other day, if you flipped on the TV to miraculously find full disclosure of all global events in their complete transparency, what I would hear come from his mouth would undoubtedly be a resounding "HOLY SH**!!" Yet there are those who still think nothing is happening; that it's business as usual. Any followers of this blog know it's anything but "business as usual". Just look to the NSA leaks, Pope resigning, bankers resigning/getting fired/disappearing/dying, politicians being exposed, whistle blowers coming out en masse, new record high levels of solar flares, people overthrowing their governments, new stories of fraud and corruption exposed daily, the Citizen's Hearing for Disclosure, massive protests going on all over the world, banks and governments foreclosed, cities declaring bankruptcy, banks being challenged by hundreds of thousands and unable to prove their loans are legitimate, science proving we are powerful co-creator (god-like) beings, the list goes on and on and on and and on and on....
The infrastructure of the former power elite is caving in and as they scramble to replace the fallen bricks, dozens more come tumbling down in their place. It's like one man trying to empty the water out of the Titanic with a bucket. Those behind all this mess are running frantically to the life boats only to find the only ones left are also flooded and beyond repair. All the yelling, screaming and shooting off of flares for help isn't going to stop 52,000 tons of steel from sinking to the bottom of the Atlantic. The Titanic (banksters, governments, systems of hierarchy and control) is going down folks and there ain't nothing anyone can do at this point to try and stop it.
No need for fear. No need for panic. This is our destiny. I know its tough. I know many people from all around the world and all walks of life are suffering. Let us join hands in and get over this hump together. Let us not allow ourselves to be divided and conquered. Let us Unite in Peace and Oneness and stand strong in our Truth. Together we have the power to collectively make a difference. It is up to us. Every one of us; to know ourselves. To know that we are the masters of our own existence. Let us not give that power away to ANYTHING or ANYONE outside of ourselves. Let us not lay down in consent to be controlled, ruled and manipulated. To accomplish True Freedom, we do not have to fight. War begets war. Fighting begets more fighting. Love, peace and compassion are the keys to our salvation. Tools to be used for personal empowerment during times of uncertainty. Love each other. Support each other at all costs. Stand with your brothers and sisters of Humanity and let's take back what we have unconsciously consented to be taken away from us for way too long. Let us Unite!
p.s. I love you all more than words could ever possibly express...
~BK
One of my favorite videos of all time and a perfect illustration...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)