August 2, 2013
I had a discussion with a friend the other day when I asked the question on Facebook, "If you found out your mortgage, car loan, student loan, credit card was fraudulent debt, would you keep paying it?" I included a link to the post I put out about Key Bank waiving a $32K loan. This was his response:
"If I borrow money from someone, I'm going to repay it. I don't care if it's the mafia, some made-up big brother organization, or a bank. Stealing is stealing, regardless what you believe, two wrongs don't make a right."
The problem with this response is that it's based on a backwards view of what money and credit REALLY is. What if everything we've ever been taught by the system to believe about money and credit is an illusion? Well, it is. Many of those who will read this article already know that. Yet even those who do know, still can't quite wrap their heads around how the system works in actuality. Believe me, "they" do an extremely good job of keeping these Truths very well hidden. This article does a phenomenal job at breaking it down in very simple, easy to understand terms. All of the facts presented are supported by hard data. Also included is an example of a response letter from AT&T to a charge being disputed, whereas the disputing party requested funds be taken from their "Prepaid Treasury Account," to settle the "alleged" debt. What is not shared by this blogger is the documentation submitted to AT&T, which I am working on trying to retrieve from him now.
Before I get to the meat and potatoes of this brilliant article, here are a few facts to consider in the response to my friend on Facebook:
"A deposit created through lending is a debt that has to be paid on demand of the depositor, just the same as the debt arising from a customer's deposit of checks or currency in the bank. Of course they do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts. – Federal Reserve Bank, Chicago, Modern Money Mechanics, p. 6
Banks are prohibited from lending their ‘own money’ from their own assets, or from other depositors. So from where did the $$ come? The contract we signed (our promissory note) was converted into a ‘negotiable instrument’ by the bank and became an asset on the bank’s accounting books. According to the UCC 1-201(24) and 3-104, it was our signature on the note which made it $$.
Our promissory note (‘money’) was taken, recorded as an asset of the bank, and sold by the bank for cash without ‘equal valuable consideration’ given to us for our note. The bank gave us a deposit slip as a receipt for the money we gave them, just as the bank would normally provide when we make a deposit to the bank. It then created an account at the bank which would contain this $$ which we just created. A check on this account was issued with our signature and this account is the source of funds behind the cheque which we received as a ‘loan’.
The bank risked none of its own assets in the so-called ‘loan’ to us; rather it used our note to pay the seller, in order to raise an asset for itself, and also used the face value of our note as ‘principal’ which it claims it ‘lent’ us and against which it charged interest. Consideration on the part of the bank is non-existent so the bank has nothing to lose. It can not possibly sustain a loss. Since consideration is essential to an enforceable contract and the note was obtained from us via fraud, the entire transaction/ contract is fraudulent.
Mortgage contracts are written in such a way to appear as if the bank lent us funds before they received our promissory note/ mortgage contract so that the bank can use it as a receipt which they can sell. The contract reads, “For a loan I have received...”, but, you haven’t received it yet. So in fact, we signed and gave the mortgage contract/note to the bank prior to their giving us the funds. So, the application for the loan created the funds (it has our signature on it) and the note (with our signature) covered the funds to ‘repay’ the loan. Again, constructive fraud."
Here is the link to the original article. On this blog there are also many other great posts to research. One point I do want to make is that this gentleman on many occasions suggests filing a UCC-1 financing statement to reclaim rights to your Strawman account. However, the UCC filings submitted by The One People's Public Trust have effectively taken care of this step for EVERYONE on the planet. Therefore, it is no longer necessary for individuals to file their own. ~BK
In this case, the “company” is the government. Because you “agreed” to work for the government, the company, for the rest of your life, the government (company) agreed to “pay” all of the debt you incur in your lifetime. Is that a bit of a surprise to you? It should be. No one has told you or showed you how use this information. In exchange for your birth certificate and your application for Social Security, which they used as collateral to reduce their debt with the bankers, the government (company) promised to pay your debts. You work on behalf of the US government AS COLLATERAL ON THE NATIONAL DEBT owed to the bankers.
Whatever your debt, it's actually prepaid.
That’s right, your debt is “prepaid” with what is known as “money of account.” There is no real substance or “money of exchange” such as gold or silver; only accounting adjustments and set offs. The US government agreed to do this for you with the passage of House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 back in 1933 shortly after the National Emergency and Bank Holiday declared by President Roosevelt. You're already signed up for this program from birth; it’s just that no one told you about it, UNTIL NOW!
Like all good companies though, the US government offered to its “worker bees”, insurance benefits. They offered insurance to us if we would fill out an SS-5 form, also known as “Application for Social Security Benefits”. It's also the hook they use to get us to sign up as their collateral on the national debt. This all originated from the “Shepard Towners Maternity Act” that was to help new mothers with the care of their children if the mother was unwed. (This is why they ask for the maiden name of the mother on the “application for live birth”. All of us are considered to be “bastard children” with the government (company) as our “daddy”)
The SS-5 is really a Power Of Attorney (POA) for the company that issued the insurance benefit to You, the real man or woman. POA was assumed by the company, the government. When they established the new account they styled the name in ALL CAPS. Very few people normally sign their name in ALL CAPS. Your JOHN H. DOE is really a corporation. Print your name in ALL CAPS if you intend to express the name/ title of Your corporation. You'll find it on "your" driver's license, "your" social security card, "your" bank statement, "your" check blanks, "your" tax statements, etc. The Social Security number is evidence that there is an insurance policy. The benefit you are receiving is the privilege of an army, navy, police, fire protection, Medicaid, medicare, SSI, pension etc.
So far it has worked quite well for the government (company)… they just didn’t tell you how to go about getting your debt set off and how to access and use the pre-paid account, all the more money for their pet projects…wars of pre-emption, international intrigue, control and domination of the global markets, etc. You/ve perhaps read about this in the news or seen it on the evening news. You're letting them use your money for crimes against humanity.
This is a YouTube video put together by the author of the blog post above. It's only 15 minutes and well worth the watch. Excellent data. It's titled, "Access Your Exemption Account," this is EXACTLY what is currently being worked on with the Declaration of Value (DOV) document, being created by Heather as I write this post. Remember: WE ARE THE CREDITORS, NOT THE DEBTORS. We have only been manipulated into believing it was the other way around for our entire lives. Time to change the game. ~BK
Yes all loans are fraud, we are the creditors not the debtors, however The Question was If you found out your mortgage, car loan, student loan, credit card was fraudulent debt, would you keep paying it?"
ReplyDelete1) did you sit down face to face with someone and make an exchange?
2) did you receive something of value in exchange for your value? (your word= eternal essence?)
3) is money a tool? our value can be any can be in any form. correct? digital, paper, plastic...
Point is when you make a commitment to someone else and you fail to deliver what you promised then your value is taken away.
If it makes people "feel" better then pretend your giving to another person. But your not really giving because you received something in return for the commitment you made. (a car, house, boat, education, ect.) someone (We the people) as ONE put their labor into creating what you just received.
On another note: I have found that when people knew from source, that their was something "odd" about the Kiri Campbell situation, and was asking for transparency, they were told that they were causing separation.
they were asking for absolute data. No different from us reporting IRS, resignations, Straw-man,governments, and banks.When we report corruption is that considered separation.
How do we the people get to pick and choose what is separation and what is data? because that is getting a little confusing.
side note: Kiri already openly admitted that she uses checks from closed accounts. The fraud checks she wrote to businesses were in may? She found out about OPPT in june, She made her DOV in July, Two days later she was arrested. Why does anyone think that the court cases had anything to do with the DOV?
Fact: there is no ABSOLUTE DATA stating that Kiri court cases have anything to do with her depositing her value!
Fact: Her trying to deposit her value resulted the exact same way that bob wrights DOV ended. With a letter
Blessings
Heather has finished with the dov. Yet shes not using it. She is scared to use it cause she knows kari got jailed. Plain and simple!
ReplyDelete