Yahoo News from Jan 30, 2013: U.S. Backed Plan to Launch Chemical Weapon Attack on Syria & Blame it on Assad's Regime

Yahoo News from Jan 30, 2013: U.S. Backed Plan to Launch Chemical Weapon Attack on Syria & Blame it on Assad's Regime
September 15, 2013

Source


False Flag Bombshell on Syria Right in Front of Our Faces
On January 29, 2013, a Daily Mail article was published by Louise Boyle that reported: "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." You may want to read this quote once again. Yes, based on this, it looks like this whole entire Syria chemical weapons attack fiasco was a staged false flag operation with the approval of the Obama administration; and this was reported almost eight months ago.

This article was originally located here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html. However, it has since been removed. You can still read it on archive.org by typing in the URL above or by clicking here. Also, Yahoo! News India reported this story on January 30, 2013. Their article is still up: http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-plan-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-syria-045648224.html

 

The article was based on an email exchange between two senior officials from Britam Defence, a British-based defense contractor. These emails were intercepted and leaked by a Malasyan hacker who also claimed to have obtained "senior executives resumés and copies of passports via an unprotected company server".

It looks like the Daily Mail article was based on an article written on Infowars.com by Paul Joseph Watson. Here is the original link to the article: http://www.infowars.com/hack-reveals-washington-approved-plan-to-stage-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/ The article has since been removed from Infowars.com; however, it can also be looked up by typing in this URL on archive.org or by clicking here.

 

 

The Infowars.com article does state that a Britam spokesman admitted that they were hacked; however, "denied that those emails were genuine".

Let me tell you this. Reading all of this information eight months later; seeing what has happened since; and connecting all the dots; it looks to me like this spokesperson was covering up a massive blunder. The US Government has a long history of setting up false flag attacks in order to instigate conflicts, sway public opinion, maintain a fear-based society, and of course conform to the "powers that were" control structure of the "elite" families.

 

American Kabuki: The Real False Flag

This needs to be shared ahead of time just in case they try to pull this ridiculous stunt off. ~BK

Got call from a contact with a past in the military.  He was quite upset about the situation in Syria. I have never heard him so upset before. He said "the false flag isn't the poison gas attacks, its the 4 unescorted Navy destroyers sitting offshore that are easy pickings for Syria's Russian-built anti-ship missiles that fly at mach 7 for which we have no defense...".  There are no US Navy Carrier groups in the mediterranean right now.

He also said "the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has offered Putin a sweet oil deal in OPEC if they don't come to Syria's aid".  This also cuts the USA out of its current role in the middle east with OPEC.

Its not a well kept secret that KSA and Qatar have been financing the rebels in Syria, both countries want to build a natural gas pipeline through Syria to Turkey so that they can ship natural gas via pipeline to Europe.  Some reports have said Putin has sided with Syria in the past because he didn't want Russia's lucrative near monopoly status on natural gas exports to Europe to end.

The contact is not a believer that Galactics will intervene in the case of any missile firing.  Let's hope he's wrong on that if this scenario plays out.

Personally I think the energetics of Earth no longer favor these kind of moves and will backfire badly if carried out to their conclusion.  Perhaps this is one of those watershed moments that exposes the banker financed wars for what they are, schemes to stay in control.